Category Archives: Uncategorized


Published · Updated

Hairdressing health and safety laws

The National Hairdressers’ Federation (NHF) has welcomed a recent decision by the European Commission (EC) not to press ahead with proposed changes to health and safety laws affecting salons.

As part of its drive to cut red tape, the EC has announced it will not be taking forward proposals which, the NHF said, could have banned salon staff from wearing high heels, required them to wear elbow-length gloves when washing hair and limited the amount of time they could spend with clients on the salon floor.

According to the NHF, the reforms could have cost salons and barbers in the industry as much as £75 million a year, if enacted to the full, based on calculations by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE).

While welcoming the news of the shelving of the proposals, a source at the Federation said the hairdressing industry should not assume the proposals are “dead and buried”.

There are plans for the EC to carry out impact assessments in early 2014 on the cost of introducing the laws.

If you require assistance, please contact us

Published · Updated

Display Screen Equipment (DSE)

Many jobs now require the prolonged use of display screen equipment and legislation places specific duties on employers regarding its use. Take a look at our thoroughly revised and updated topic to make sure you are aware of what needs to be done.

Display screen equipment (DSE) is covered by the Health and Safety (Display Screen Equipment) Regulations 1992 (as amended), which promote the safe and effective use of DSE.

All aspects of the equipment and workstation are considered part of work with DSE.

The way in which DSE is used may lead to upper limb disorders, fatigue, stress or eye discomfort.

Excessive force, repetitive activities and poor postures are the three components perceived to be the biggest contributors to ill health associated with DSE work.

Appropriate set up of all features of the workstation can prevent discomfort from work with DSE. Contact us if you require a workstation assessment.

Selection of peripheral items for use with DSE can greatly improve the user’s comfort and effectiveness. Items must be selected for the person or the task to ensure suitability.

Rest breaks and changes of activity are essential in ensuring safe and effective work with DSE.

Checklists can be used to assess DSE work and ensure the workstation is suitable for the user to complete the required tasks.

Contact Walker Health & Safety Services for your health and safety requirements.

Published · Updated

Manual Handling

Manual handling injuries account for over a third of all accidents reported to the enforcing authorities each year. Under the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (as amended) the employer has legal duties to:

  • avoid the need to carry out manual handling operations wherever possible;
  • if manual handling cannot be avoided the task should be automated or mechanised in some way, in order to reduce the amount of manual handling required;
  • if manual handling cannot be avoided, an employer must assess the risks involved with the operations and take steps to avoid them.

This assessment is necessary to ensure that employees do not suffer injuries from manual handling tasks and it is important to note that there is no maximum weight given for manual handling tasks.

Most of the assessments can be done in house and will just require a few minutes’ observation to identify ways to make the activity less hazardous, i.e. less physically demanding.

When making these observations employees should be consulted, as more often than not they are aware of what the problems are and the easiest ways of avoiding them. The overall responsibility for suitable assessments remains with the employer.

A general assessment of risk, as required by Regulation 3(1) of the Management Regulations may indicate the possibility of injury from manual handling operations; in this case a more specific assessment should be carried out. How detailed this further assessment needs to be will depend on the circumstances. In general, the significant findings of the assessment should be recorded and the record kept, readily accessible, as long as it remains relevant.

Assessments need not be recorded if:

  • it could be easily repeated and explained at any time because it is simple and obvious
  • the manual handling operations are of low risk, only going to last a very short time and the time taken to record the assessment would be disproportionate.

When making a more detailed assessment the following categories should be considered:

The TASK

The INDIVIDUAL CAPABILITY

The LOAD

The working ENVIRONMENT

(These can be easily remembered by the acronym TILE)

Twisting

In many cases manual handling operations will involve some twisting, i.e. moving the upper body while keeping the feet static. The combination of twisting and lifting and twisting, stooping and lifting are particularly stressful on the back. Where the handling involves twisting and turning then a detailed assessment should normally be made.

However if the operation is:

  • relatively infrequent (up to approximately 30 operations per hour or one lift every two minutes); and there are no other posture problems;
  • then the guideline figures in the relevant part of this filter can be used, but with a suitable reduction according to the amount the handler twists to the side during the operation.

As a rough guide:

  • Twisting beyond 45º reduce the weight by 10%
  • Twisting beyond 90º reduce the weight by 20%

Carrying

The guideline figures for lifting and lowering apply to carrying operations where the load is:

  • held against the body;
  • carried no further than about 10 m without resting.

A more detailed assessment should be made for all carrying operations if the load is carried over a longer distance without resting or the hands are below knuckle height or above elbow height.

Pushing and Pulling

For pushing and pulling operations (whether the load is slid, rolled or supported on wheels) the guideline figures (below) assume the force is applied with the hands, between knuckle and shoulder height. It is also assumed that the distance involved is no more than about 20 m. If these assumptions are not met, a more detailed risk assessment is required.

Men Women

Force required to stop or start the load 20Kg 15Kg

Sustained force to keep the load in motion 10Kg 7Kg

There is no specific limit to the distance over which the load is pushed or pulled as long as there are adequate opportunities for rest or recovery.

Reviewing the assessment

The assessment should be kept up to date. It should be reviewed if new information comes to light or if there has been a change in the manual handling operations.

The assessment may also need to be reviewed if an injury occurs, or an employee becomes more vulnerable to risk due to illness, or the onset of disability or pregnancy.

Training

An employer must also provide training regarding manual handling. This should include manual handling risk factors and how injuries occur, good handling technique, appropriate safe systems of work, use of mechanical aids.

Remember that training by itself cannot overcome:

  • a lack of mechanical aids
  • unsuitable loads
  • poor working conditions.

Overview

  • Consider avoiding the need for manual handling by re-engineering the process.
  • Consider reducing the risk by minimising or reducing the load/task.
  • Appoint persons who have been adequately trained for manual handling assessments, and ensure that all work activities where manual handling cannot be avoided are adequately assessed.
  • Conduct manual handling assessments of work activities taking into account the task, the individual the load, and the environment – TILE!
  • Provide handling aids and equipment.
  • Train staff and maintain training records.
  • Record the assessment and keep it up to date. Review the assessment if new information comes to light or if a change in manual handling operations occurs.

 

Published · Updated

Changes to the RIDDOR Regulations come into force today.


 

The Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013 come into force today.

The main changes made by these Regulations are:

  • A simplified and shortened list of specified reportable injuries (“major injuries”) to workers sustained as a result of a work-related accident.
  • A clarified and shortened list of reportable dangerous occurrences (near-miss events).
  • A simplified and significantly shortened list of reportable ill-health conditions in workers (replacing 47 specified ill-health conditions with 8 categories of work related diseases).
  • A simplified list of dangerous occurrences within the rail-sector, and removal of the requirement to report suicides on railways.

No changes are being made to:

  • Recording requirements;
  • Reports of fatal accidents;
  • Reports of accidents involving non-workers including members of the public;
  • Reports of accidents which incapacitate workers for more than seven days;
  • Requirements to preserve certain incident sites at mines, quarries and offshore workplaces pending investigation and subject to overriding safety needs.

Minor changes in wording have been made to the requirements for reporting gas hazards and injuries.  It remains a defence in proceedings to prove that the organisation was unaware of the circumstances which gave rise to a reporting requirement, provided they have taken reasonable steps to be made aware.

A new regulation (15) restricts the need to report the same incident twice, provided that all the information required in respect of the multiple reporting requirements has been given and timescales are met.

New categories of reportable injury to employees

The list of major injuries is now contained within regulation 4 rather than within a schedule. Fractures other than to fingers, thumbs and toes are still reportable though with the caveat ‘as diagnosed by a medical practitioner. ‘Any amputation’ as a category has been replaced with ‘amputation of an arm, hand, finger, thumb, leg, foot or toe’.

Dislocations, chemical/ hot metal injuries to the eye, electric shock related injury, heat induced illness, hypothermia, and unconsciousness (in general), injuries requiring resuscitation in general and those requiring admittance to hospital for more than 24 hours are no longer reportable as major injuries.

The sight loss category has become, ‘any injury diagnosed by a registered medical practitioner as being likely to cause permanent blinding or reduction in sight in one or both eyes’.

Next there are three new categories:

  • Any crush injury to the head or torso causing damage to the brain or internal organs in the chest or abdomen;
  • Any burn injury (including scalding) which covers more than 10% of the whole body’s total surface area or causes significant damage to the eyes, respiratory system or other vital organs;
  • Any degree of scalping requiring hospital treatment

Loss of consciousness caused by head injury or asphyxia is an altered category (previously loss of consciousness caused by asphyxia or exposure to substances was reportable).

Another new category is:

  • Any other injury arising from working in an enclosed space which leads to hypothermia or heat-induced illness; or requires resuscitation or admittance to hospital for more than 24 hours.

Note. For the time being we do not have a definition of ‘enclosed space’.

Changes to Reportable Disease Categories

Reportable occupational diseases are now summarised in regulation 8 as follows:

  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, where the person’s work involves regular use of percussive or vibrating tools;
  • Cramp in the hand or forearm, where the person’s work involves prolonged periods of repetitive movement of the fingers, hand or arm;
  • Occupational dermatitis, where the person’s work involves significant or regular exposure to a known skin sensitizer or irritant;
  • Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome, where the person’s work involves regular use of percussive or vibrating tools, or the holding of materials, which are subject to percussive processes, or processes causing vibration;
  • Occupational asthma, where the person’s work involves significant or regular exposure to a known respiratory sensitizer; or,
  • Tendonitis or tenosynovitis in the hand or forearm, where the person’s work is physically demanding and involves frequent, repetitive movements.

And regulation 9 adds two further categories:

  • Any cancer attributed to an occupational exposure to a known human carcinogen or mutagen (including ionising radiation); or
  • Any disease attributed to an occupational exposure to a biological agent.

Conclusion

The regulations have essentially been redrafted with some sections imported from the old regulations into the new structure. Even where requirements are very similar such as in the list of general dangerous occurrences there are subtle differences in wording.

Contact us if you require assistance.

Published · Updated

New and Expectant Mothers

Employers must ensure that they protect new and expectant mothers from potential hazards in the workplace.

The law requires employers to assess the risks to their employees, including new and expectant mothers, and do as much as possible to control those risks.

This risk assessment must take account of work, which is of a kind, which could involve risks to the health and safety of a new or expectant mother because of her condition, or to that of her baby, from any processes, working conditions and physical, biological or chemical agents.

A new or expectant mother is defined as an employee who is pregnant, or has given birth within the previous 6 months, or who is breast-feeding.

The Assessment

The risk assessment must consider the following:

Manual handling – all expectant and new mothers must avoid significant manual handling operations.

The use of chemicals and substances – where identified as being hazardous, the use of chemicals must be eliminated or substituted from the work program of the employee.

Working whilst standing – where the employee’s role involves considerable standing, there should be regular short rest breaks.

Operating hazardous machinery – operating certain types of machinery (i.e. noisy, vibrating, etc.) can promote fatigue, discomfort and put the employee’s safety at risk. The use of this type of equipment should be avoided.

Night work – this type of work can cause concern or stress to certain individuals. Where this is identified, the person should be offered the option of transferring to daytime work.

New and Expectant Mothers

When you are notified in writing by an employee that she:

  • Is pregnant
  • Has given birth within the previous 6 months; or
  • Is breast-feeding

You must:

Identify any risks to the new or expectant mother.

Where there are risks to the health and safety of a new or expectant mother, which cannot be avoided by the preventative measures taken, you will need to:

  • Alter her working conditions and / or hours if possible and would avoid the risk. If this is not possible you must:
  • Offer alternative work. If this is not possible:
  • Suspend her from work. The Employment Rights Act 1996 requires that this be on full pay.

Information

You should ensure that all new and expectant mothers are provided with comprehensive and relevant information on:

  • The risks to their health and safety as identified by the risk assessments; and
  • The measures adopted by the employer to control these risks

Review of Assessments

The risk assessment for the pregnant worker must be kept under review. Although the hazards are likely to remain the same throughout the pregnancy the risk may vary through the different stages of pregnancy.

Co-ordination, speed of movement and reach are all likely to be impaired because of the pregnant workers’ increase in size.

Rest Facilities

Facilities should be provided for expectant and nursing mothers to rest, which are:

  • Conveniently situated in relation to sanitary facilities; and
  • Include the facility to lie down.